If NATO’s whole “anti-election campaign” didn’t work, neither did the intimidation, the strategy of spreading fear, doubt and confusion among the Russian people.

❗️Join us on Telegram, Twitter , and VK.

Contact us: info@strategic-culture.su

The recent Russian elections represented a whole new level of aggression against the concept of “journalism” and the right to information of Western peoples. If anyone thought that by now the mainstream media monopolies — still disguised as “media” services — had reached their lowest point… These elections threaten to become known as the deadliest ever!

The days, weeks, leading up to the three-day election acted as a warm-up for what was to come. Macron — L’imitation de Napoléon — took up the baton and, like a general in trousers, started threatening Russia that his France, that military portent, could send troops to Ukraine. Not happy with the threat, he went on to say that there were no limits and no red lines in the first place.

After specifying that this would only happen if the Russian forces tried to approach from the direction of Kiev or Odessa (did he “offer” everything in between?), in an act that led many people to think — myself included — that Macron had put the brakes on, pulling back several lines of defense, the fact is that he then signed an agreement with Moldova, in what is a clear provocation to the executive presided over by Vladimir Putin, and met with his cronies from Germany and Poland to ensure cohesion in the aggression.

Through the back door, someone must have given to the press the idea that the nano-Napoleon was furious at Scholz’s supposed cowardice, specifically with regard to the German vegan sausage’s resistance to sending Taurus missiles, so that the Kiev regime could continue to kill civilians in the Donbass, Kursk or Belgorod. As for killing Russian military personnel, it’s getting harder than ever.

It seems to me that all this fuss about l’enfant terrible was aimed, among other things, at putting pressure on Vladimir Putin, just before the election, and at the same time trying to test the resolve of the Russian people to support their leader. The idea, in my view, was to subject the Russian people to a threat of escalation by putting the emphasis on the actions of their president, while at the same time implying that the chances of NATO intervening on Ukrainian territory depend exclusively on the presence of what this bureaucratic and servile army considers to be the only threat responsible for the confrontation between the two blocs: Vladimir Putin. It was a kind of subliminal blackmail of the Russian people: elect the “autocrat”, the “tyrant”, the “dictator” and risk a direct confrontation between your country and Europe, read “NATO”.

While the only question raised by the media monopolies was the possibility that Macron would do this for reasons related to his own election propaganda for the European parliament, the truth is that the existing barometers on the possibility of sending troops to Ukraine, in particular the poll carried out by BFM TV, say that 57% of French people think that Macron is wrong in this regard.

Now, if the French people reject the possibility, it makes no sense that it was for internal electoral reasons that the threat was made. And in this respect, I agree with Macron’s defense that none of this had anything to do with any electoral impetus…. Internally! In other words, L’imitation de Napoléon partially lied. The electioneering impetus was related to an attempt to interfere in the Russian elections. Something that Russia is condemned for allegedly trying to do on west side.

Before that, the whole Navalny affair had been a kind of illusionist spectacle aimed at creating the illusion that the opposition to Vladimir Putin was greater than it actually is. Considering that his death was part of the show, given the results obtained, I regret to inform those who saw some kind of liberating image in a corrupt racist, that Navalny died in vain. In fact, this is one of those cartoonish cases in which the illusionist, in order to perform his act successfully, ends up killing his assistant. Sad.

In an attempt to give some credibility to the threats of both confrontation and sedition, in the week leading up to the start of the elections, a media operation was mounted, with military overtones, in which supposed groups called “The Freedom of Russia Legion (FRL)” and the “Siberian Battalion (SB)” crossed the border and claimed occupation of two villages. Many photos with flags and videos later, images emerged confirming the slaughter of a large part of the mercenaries — with whom the Kiev regime claims to have nothing to do — and their combat vehicles. What I call Operation Kamikaze went on for days, losing well over a thousand soldiers in this military marketing operation.

What we can characterize as NATO’s campaign strategy for the Russian elections will be known as the deadliest, most ruinous and failed political propaganda operation. The main figures and “activists” have almost all died! At this rate and at the rate Putin wins elections, I don’t know how many more Navalnys or kamikaze battalions the CIA will have to invent. No wonder the New York Times is belatedly confirming what we’ve known for a long time: Ukrainian villages are already undermanned, and Lindsay Graham is now telling Zelensky that it’s time to send the youngest to the front line!

However, there’s one thing we have to face: it’s really dangerous to run an (anti-) election campaign against Vladimir Putin…. It’s deadly! A considerable number of propagandists have died at the hands of the CIA and the Kiev regime. And for what? In the end, voter turnout was a record for years and the Russian president obtained his highest result ever.

If NATO’s whole “anti-election campaign” didn’t work, neither did the intimidation, the strategy of spreading fear, doubt and confusion among the Russian people, which could even be said to have had the opposite effect. The Russian people gave a lesson in citizenship, responsibility, courage and resistance that would make any citizen of any country proud if they saw their own people behaving in this way. Regardless of the direction of the vote, a people mobilized in this way will not fail to take their future into their own hands.

Over here, it was an anti-pedagogical circus. In three days, everything and its opposite was said about the Russian elections. Despite the fact that 1,125 independent observers from 129 countries were present, it was said on television that the election was not being monitored by international observers. As if there was any monitoring in the West, and as if the West, which is sliding towards neo-fascism, was itself in a position to give democratic lessons to any country. Anyone who supports fascist and Nazi regimes, like the one in Kiev, or xenophobic regimes, like those in the Baltic countries, loses all credibility to give any kind of lesson.

Accusations of repression poured in and it was even claimed that voting in Russia is compulsory. After all, we had to justify the “Stockholm syndrome” of 77% of voters who, despite the “warnings”, still wanted to say “yes”. And while in the previous days, “warnings” had rained down from Western embassies, alerting their citizens to the danger of terrorist attacks in Russia and advising them to avoid crowds. As if, if there were attacks, they wouldn’t be perpetrated by themselves.

Navalny’s own ghost has resurfaced… The wear and tear they put this figure through! Navalny had promised to destabilize the election with operation “twelve noon”. Reuters even took pictures of the huge queues to vote and said that these were peaceful protests by the Russian “opposition”. “Thousands”! Reuters said. As if in a country with more than a hundred million voters, a few thousand were representative of anything. In embassies across Europe, despite boycott operations such as the expulsion of diplomats, the queues were felt and, in many cases, reported as if they were disconnected from the will to vote.

Liquids spilled on ballot boxes, the bombing of civilians by the Kiev regime, acts of subversion at polling stations — all of this has been overlooked by the objective analysis of the so-called news services of the Western democracies. One thing is certain: if the Russian people’s support for the elections was a cry for affirmation of their identity and a real act of struggle and offense against continued aggression that is contrary to their interests, the less attentive Western peoples did not hear that cry. But they will feel the effects of the offensive.

As with the “news” coverage of the information monopolies, the Western peoples will suffer the effects of Russia’s popular offensive in various areas of their lives: in their living conditions, victims of the detour of funds from public services to the arms industries; in the repression of their rights, through the intensification of operations to censor information that is not in line with the western single truth; in the acceleration of the promotion of neo-fascism, the only mechanism available to imperialism to guarantee governance through hatred and xenophobia against the Russian people; in the promotion of diversionary strategies that divert western peoples from their real anxieties: the right to peace, food, education, health and housing!

The Russian people have emerged victorious from western aggression, perpetrating a resounding counterattack against NATO’s subliminal offensive, while the Western peoples, if they don’t wake up to reality, will be in such a situation that they won’t even be able to identify where the attacks they feel are coming from!

If anything proves everything I’ve said about this aggression against truth, it’s that Western peoples are being led blindfolded into a deadly confrontation!